How is a student’s performance typically evaluated in performance assessments?

In performance assessments, a student’s performance is typically evaluated via a rubric. A rubric provides a clear framework that outlines the criteria for assessment, allowing educators to assess student work based on specific, defined standards. This structured approach helps ensure consistency and fairness in the evaluation process, as it allows for a more objective measure of student comprehension and skills.

Rubrics often include various levels of performance, detailing what constitutes excellent, satisfactory, or inadequate work in each area being assessed. This allows both the teacher and student to have a mutual understanding of the expectations and outcomes of the assessment. Additionally, rubrics can highlight strengths and weaknesses in student performance, guiding future instruction and learning goals.

The other options lack the structured and detailed approach that rubrics provide. Observational assessments may be subjective and rely heavily on the observer's interpretation, while standardized tests measure a student’s knowledge based on a fixed scale that might not reflect individual skills effectively. Peer feedback can be beneficial in some contexts but may not always provide the comprehensive evaluation or consistency that a rubric offers.